4 stages of intranet maturity

July 8th, 2009 by Janus Boye | , | 4 Comments

Several stages of intranet maturityEuropean intranet expert Jane McConnell has defined 3 stages of intranet maturity. So what’s next for the organisations that have reached stage 3? Lately, I’ve been discussing this with several of our intranet community of practice members and it seems like even the best intranets still have many areas in which they can improve.

Here’s a brief description of the 3 stages of intranet maturity as defined by Jane;

  • Stage 1 is where the intranet will become the “way of working” in 3 or 4 years or more. These intranets show signs of lack of strategy, a low level of resources and a very low degree of management attention.
  • Stage 2 is an intermediary stage where the intranet will become the “way of working” in 1 or 2 years. These organizations reported major leaps in the last 12 months in key areas such as the integration of business applications into the intranet.
  • Stage 3 is reached when the intranet is the “way of working” today. These intranets have reached a high degree of maturity and purpose. If the intranet “goes down” for 1 or 2 hours, 90 percent are disrupted in daily work activities.

For a more detailed description of each stage, see Jane’s posting on Global Intranet Trends for 2009 – Highlights.

Several of those that consider their organisation at Stage 3 have told me that the intranet journey has continued to present them with new and interesting challenges. To be fair, the general problem with maturity models also applies to intranets: While some intranet managers might consider their organisation to have arrived at Stage 3, several sections, departments, divisions or subsidiaries might still be at a lower level.

A new and final (?) stage could be defined as:

  • Stage 4 is when the intranet has been the “way of working” for 1 to 2 years

From the few conversations I’ve had with intranet managers on this topic, I’ve extracted these characteristics of Stage 4 intranets:

  • They lead in use of collaboration and have more contributors than earlier stage intranets
  • Management might consider that “the intranet has achieved the results we wanted it to – job done” and seriously slaughter the intranet team. With the downturn in the global economy more Stage 4 intranets are vulnerable to this.
  • They are still plagued by usability problems, eg. with specific applications that require significant training, are not accessible for users with disabilities or simply too complex to use
  • There is an increased organisational awareness of intranet toolbox, e.g. when to use which blogs or when to use a wiki
  • Has something like an intranet mantra or internal intranet award, which acts as a catalyst for intranet support

What do you see as the main challenges for Stage 4 intranets?

NB: If you are very interested in intranet maturity, US-based digital agency Avenue A – Razorfish, also has something called The Intranet Maturity Framework which has 6 stages. Interestingly only the 3 initial stages are called something with intranet. #4 is a portal, #5 is a dashboard and #6 is a workplace.

Join our full day seminar, the International Intranet Day, on March 24 in Copenhagen, to learn from case studies from several organisations and network with other intranet professionals.

Author

Janus Boye

Janus is based in Denmark. As founder and managing director at J. Boye, he has grown the business from an office at home in 2003 to a global operation today; still a small team, but with permanent presence in both Denmark and the United Kingdom.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  1. Jane McConnell July 9th, 2009 17:22

    Hi Janus,

    Shiv Singh and I discussed the Razorfish model several years ago when we met in a conference in California. James Robertson was there too. The Razorfish model is primarily based on technology, not usages. It is one way of looking at intranets and is primarily shaped by US organizations’ experiences. European organizations’ intranets have evolved quite differently.

    I blogged about our conversations in 2006:
    http://netjmc.typepad.com/globally_local/2006/08/report_on_best_.html
    and again here
    http://netjmc.typepad.com/globally_local/2006/03/essential_3_dim.html
    You can read Shiv’s comment on the second post.

    For me, Stages are only partially about technology, but primarily about strategy, implementation, adoption, governance, etc.

    I’d love to discuss your 4th Stage in more detail one day. I would place the points you list as still Stage 3 intranets. Stage 4 is something quite different
    .
    This will make for a great conversation…maybe in Aarhus on a panel?
    Greetings from hot Provence, and have a good summer!
    Jane

  2. James Robertson July 9th, 2009 17:22

    “What’s next” is always a good topic of discussion for intranets! While most intranets are still in only stages 1 or 2, we do need to plan future directions for intranets that have achieved level 3…

    PS. in terms of stages of maturity, we’ve also defined the “six phases of intranet evolution”, which broadly match up with Jane’s stages:

    http://www.slideshare.net/jamesr/the-six-phases-of-intranet-evolution-includes-audio

  3. Janus Boye July 13th, 2009 17:22

    Dear Jane & James
    Thank you for contributing to the discussion.

    @jane: I agree that Stages are primarily about strategy, governance, adoption etc. and less technology

    @james “Phase 6: Intranets as a business tool” on your intranet evolution scale – There are different phases of this. What’s next for those of our members who have already achieved this ?

    Cheers,

  4. J. Boye » Blog Archive » How is your intranet doing? July 23rd, 2009 17:22

    [...] It will be interesting to see what new trends have emerged in the intranet landscape compared to last year’s results, which, among other things, stated that the current intranet model is unsustainable. Will this year’s results show more advanced intranets, perhaps calling for a fourth stage of intranet maturity? [...]

Leave a Comment

Read our commentary policy.