Yesterday CMS Watch released their annual technology predictions. One of the more surprising ones for me was:
#10. Long-awaited consolidation comes to the WCM space
The CMS Watch team argues that “It may be falling valuations rather than falling sales that inspires some activity here” and they caution that mergers “can be painful for customers, since typically one tool or another goes into the long good-night”.
I don’t have enough insights into the North American web content management (WCM) marketplace to comment on local marketplace dynamics “over there”, but for the European marketplace, I don’t expect any significant consolidation among CMS vendors and CMS products any time soon. Having recently studied the annual reports of Danish vendors such as Dynamicweb and Sitecore, both seem very capable of independently surviving 2009 and beyond. The same goes for larger European vendors such as Alterion, CoreMedia, Day, EPiServer and Terminalfour, which all continue to win new customers and grow the business.
The CMS industry has previously survived one period of low growth (roughly 2001 – 2003) and did not emerge on the other side with less vendors or less products.
My main arguments for why consolidation still will not happen are:
- As an industry we don’t really have any relevant industry standards, which could help ease the migration for customers from one product to another or which could help achieve lower implementation times
- Most vendors are in quite good financial shape. While they might fire some sales staff; perhaps even some engineers. They might exhibit at fewer conferences. Yet they still have a steady source of support revenue keeping them afloat.
- Recent years have been good, so most vendors think very highly of their own valuations. Remember that few European vendors are publicly traded, so with falling interest rates investors might be slightly more patient.
- SharePoint is popular, but if the past is any guide, then it is certainly not an altogether safe choice. The other large vendors, e.g. IBM, Oracle and SAP, don’t have any attractive CMS offering at the moment.
- Who should buy whom? Most of the larger vendors with deep pockets, e.g. Oracle, are busy enough with product development on their existing platform.
If you are more interested in this topic, I highly recommend 2 old, but relevant articles by Australian industry pundit James Robertson:
What’s your take? Do you think consolidation will finally happen in 2009?


J. Boye » Blog Archive » Prediction: 2009 will be a tough year for most integrators December 18th, 2008 0:32
[...] it will be nasty and many enterprises will be affected. As I mentioned previously there will be no consolidation among CMS vendors, but in a difficult market you can definitely expect consolidation among system [...]
J. Boye » Blog Archive » Autonomy buys Interwoven - What it means for customers January 24th, 2009 0:32
[...] Unlike when a bank buys another bank, there was little overlap between the product suites by Interwoven and Autonomy. Autonomy did not have a CMS and Interwoven did not have their own search engine. Autonomy certainly did not acquire Interwoven to leave the CMS marketplace, but rather to plant both feet in the marketplace. This announcement means still no CMS consolidation in 2009. [...]
J. Boye » Blog Archive » Oracle buys Sun - What it means for customers May 1st, 2009 0:32
[...] Sun did not have their own web content management system, so there is no news when it comes to CMS consolidation in 2009 [...]
J. Boye » Blog Archive » Open Text buys Vignette - What it means to customers May 22nd, 2009 0:32
[...] plenty of choice and no CMS consolidation. Even though this is the 3rd acquisition in the marketplace in 2009 (Oracle bought Sun and Autonomy [...]